Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was launched 4 years prior to the NEX-3N and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the GR Digital III grades against the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony NEX-3N
GR Digital III | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh GR Digital III
NEX-3N | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-3N
GR Digital III | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III features outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony NEX-3N in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital III against the NEX-3N.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital III and NEX-3N is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital III and NEX-3N.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital III is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-07-27 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $399 | $399 |