Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed December 2016
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and HX350 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was revealed 8 years before the HX350 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital III matches up against the HX350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony HX350
GR Digital III | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
HX350 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 90 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony HX350
GR Digital III | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III enjoys physical dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III versus the HX350.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and HX350 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and HX350.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital III with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX350 will render greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital III will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-27 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) | 652 gr (1.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $399 | - |