Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
53 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Replaced the Sony RX10 II
- Renewed by Sony RX10 IV
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and RX10 III (1") feature different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital III was introduced 7 years prior to the RX10 III which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GR Digital III matches up against the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony RX10 III
GR Digital III | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Ricoh GR Digital III
RX10 III | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 81 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 920k | Sharper display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 III
GR Digital III | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III has got outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III against the RX10 III.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and RX10 III is 92 and 53 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and RX10 III.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony RX10 III will provide you with greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-27 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) | 1051 grams (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $399 | $1,398 |