Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34


89 Imaging
50 Features
74 Overall
59
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Released June 2013
- Replaced the Sony RX100
- Updated by Sony RX100 III

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Below, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX100 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and RX100 II (1") use different sensor sizes.

The GR Digital III was released 4 years before the RX100 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the GR Digital III scores versus the RX100 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony RX100 II
GR Digital III | RX100 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Ricoh GR Digital III
RX100 II | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX100 II
GR Digital III | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital III offers outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Sony RX100 II has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX100 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the RX100 II.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and RX100 II is 92 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital III and RX100 II.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital III because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 II will render extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-27 | 2013-06-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 208g (0.46 pounds) | 281g (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $399 | $598 |