Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony W370, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and W370 (14MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and W370 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital III was brought out 5 months before the W370 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the GR Digital III scores versus the W370 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery and Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Sony W370
| GR Digital III | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| W370 | GR Digital III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony W370
| GR Digital III | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | January 2010 | Similar generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony W370 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR Digital III compared to the W370.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital III and W370 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital III and W370.
To sum up, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony W370 will offer you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-27 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | GR engine III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.6-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 208 gr (0.46 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $230 |