Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/1.7").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 15 months prior to the EX2F which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the EX2F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung EX2F
GR Digital IV | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+1230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX2F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | September 2011 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung EX2F
GR Digital IV | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV against the EX2F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and EX2F.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung EX2F to give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $478 |