Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was brought out 9 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-300 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-300
XZ-2 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | January 2005 | More modern by 96 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 134k | Crisper screen (+786k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-300 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and XZ-2 iHS is 67 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $800 | $450 |