Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Launched December 2012
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The E-300 was brought out 9 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-300 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-300

 XZ-2 iHS E-300 
LaunchedDecember 2012January 2005More modern by 96 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k134kCrisper screen (+786k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-300 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and XZ-2 iHS is 67 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and XZ-2 iHS.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
resolution not great (8MP)
46
focusing manually
has face detection focus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
66
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
small sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
great battery power (340 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography information
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
resolution not great (8MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
61
great battery power (340 shots)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (346g)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse function
55
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse recording
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
36
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external microphone support
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (346 grams)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus E-300Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2005-01-10 2012-12-18
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 346g (0.76 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $800 $450