Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly similar but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and SL102 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR Digital IV was unveiled 2 years after the SL102 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the GR Digital IV scores versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung SL102

 GR Digital IV SL102 
LaunchedSeptember 2011January 2009More modern by 33 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SL102 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL102

 GR Digital IV SL102 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV and the SL102.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and SL102.

As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV comes with the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The more modern GR Digital IV should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography features
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography features
41
manual focus
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
25
comes with face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography features
Samsung SL102 Street photography features
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
55
lighter than others in class (116g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery power (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Travel photography camera
67
great battery power (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
62
lighter than others in class (116 grams)
built-in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography factors
53
manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
27
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging details
Samsung SL102 Vlogging details
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic port
30
great maximum aperture (f)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than others in class (116g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung SL102
Also Known as - ES55
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-09-15 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190g (0.42 pounds) 116g (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $599 $130