Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB250F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB250F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was revealed 16 months prior to the WB250F making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB250F
GR Digital IV | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB250F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 16 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB250F
GR Digital IV | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the WB250F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and WB250F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB250F will render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $250 |