Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GR Digital IV was introduced 16 months earlier than the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB800F

 GR Digital IV WB800F 
Display resolution1230k460kCrisper display (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 WB800F GR Digital IV 
ReleasedJanuary 2013September 2011Fresher by 16 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB800F

 GR Digital IV WB800F 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV and the WB800F.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and WB800F.

As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB800F will offer you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
44
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography information
Samsung WB800F Travel photography information
67
great battery life (390 per charge)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (218 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
great reach (483mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
53
you can focus manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (390 shots)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
50
has manual focus
pretty wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
Samsung WB800F Vlogging factors
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-09-15 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lb) 218 grams (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $599 $300