Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital IV was introduced 16 months earlier than the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung WB800F
GR Digital IV | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
WB800F | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | September 2011 | Fresher by 16 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung WB800F
GR Digital IV | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV and the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and WB800F.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB800F will offer you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung WB800F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $300 |