Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and DP3 Merrill (15MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 16 months earlier than the DP3 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the DP3 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
GR Digital IV | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
DP3 Merrill | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | September 2011 | Newer by 16 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sigma DP3 Merrill
GR Digital IV | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the DP3 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and DP3 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and DP3 Merrill.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will result in extra detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $1,353 |