Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
65 Imaging
73 Features
93 Overall
81
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Released April 2017
- Updated by Sony A9 II
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A9 (24MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A9 (Full frame) boast different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was announced 6 years earlier than the A9 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up versus the A9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha A9. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A9
GR Digital IV | A9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A9 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2017 | September 2011 | Newer by 68 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 1230k | Clearer screen (+210k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A9
GR Digital IV | A9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony A9 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") along with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony A9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the GR Digital IV against the A9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and A9 is 92 and 65 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and A9.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A9 will render more detail with its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A9 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 673 grams (1.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 650 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Launch pricing | $599 | $4,498 |