Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17f8b/17f8b55ab21654a92e7b6298adb931148c40c5fe" alt="Sony Alpha A9 Mark II front Sony Alpha A9 Mark II front"
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Launched October 2019
- Succeeded the Sony A9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A9 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A9 II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The GR Digital IV was released 9 years earlier than the A9 II which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the A9 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A9 II
GR Digital IV | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A9 II | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 98 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 1230k | Crisper display (+210k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A9 II
GR Digital IV | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony A9 II has specifications of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A9 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital IV against the A9 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a805/8a805a265c701642bc3f1679dccce0f566b98247" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and A9 II is 92 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d08db/d08dbd6733faceb92edb76f8bfbfc33f02b1203c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and A9 II.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A9 II will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a10f4/a10f42ee5ccb16f2fbf0c0e5aeb6f125787f8fa2" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95eb2/95eb266112d2b70c8474fe2ec9c963c6ac32887a" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 678 grams (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 690 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $4,498 |