Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A380
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A350 (14MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A350 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years later than the A350 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A350

 GR Digital IV A350 
IntroducedSeptember 2011June 2008Fresher by 40 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 A350 GR Digital IV 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A350

 GR Digital IV A350 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers physical measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital IV against the A350.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and A350.

Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A350 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Sony A350
41
has manual focus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
71
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
Sony A350 as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
66
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
heavier than others in class (674 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography features
Sony A350 Sports photography features
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery power (390 per charge)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography details
Sony A350 Travel photography details
67
great battery power (390 per charge)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (674 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Landscape photography with Sony A350
53
has manual focus
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
64
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
Sony A350 Vlogging highlights
29
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone jack
9
can't record video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A350
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2011-09-15 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximal aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery life 390 images -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $599 $600