Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2017
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-50, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Ricoh. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very well matched but the GR II (APS-C) and WG-50 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR II was brought out 23 months before the WG-50 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the GR II grades against the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh WG-50
GR II | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Ricoh GR II
WG-50 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | June 2015 | More recent by 23 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-50
GR II | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II offers exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR II compared to the WG-50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR II and WG-50 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WG-50.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The GR II provides the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The older GR II is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 300 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $280 |