Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB2200F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is very close but the GR II (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The GR II was released 18 months later than the WB2200F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the GR II scores vs the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB2200F
GR II | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 18 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GR II
WB2200F | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB2200F
GR II | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II features outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has specifications of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR II vs the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27ca5/27ca5843ecc2705c3c33204dee8614a63f4a0b80" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and WB2200F is 89 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdaeb/bdaebf322d2da4d36a3c8627c9bd94cb7ba28782" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and WB2200F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same resolution but different sensor sizing. The GR II uses the larger sensor which should make achieving bokeh easier. The more modern GR II should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4631f/4631fe1884d7ed3eb002e8f08c01b110e556bab7" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1efab/1efabb31d6064fa1ad8818d01d59da1501a64661" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 1/8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 708g (1.56 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $599 | $599 |