Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced February 2013
- Alternate Name is Wi-Fi
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and Galaxy Camera (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR III was revealed 5 years after the Galaxy Camera which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the GR III grades vs the Galaxy Camera in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
GR III | Galaxy Camera | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | February 2013 | More modern by 69 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 922k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Ricoh GR III
Galaxy Camera | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera
GR III | Galaxy Camera | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III has got outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR III and the Galaxy Camera.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and Galaxy Camera is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and Galaxy Camera.
As you can see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GR III should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
Also called as | - | Wi-Fi |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 300g (0.66 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $900 | $450 |