Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR III was revealed 6 years after the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the GR III scores against the Galaxy Camera 3G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
GR III | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | August 2012 | More modern by 74 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 0k | Sharper display (+1037k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Ricoh GR III
Galaxy Camera 3G | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
GR III | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III offers physical dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR III vs the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and Galaxy Camera 3G is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and Galaxy Camera 3G.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GR III with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher GR III is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | - |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $900 | $606 |