Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and HZ25W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR III was revealed 8 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR III grades against the HZ25W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ25W. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung HZ25W
GR III | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | July 2010 | More recent by 101 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh GR III
HZ25W | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ25W
GR III | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III features physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the GR III and the HZ25W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and HZ25W.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will show greater detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger GR III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ25W |
Other name | - | WB5000 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-09-25 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $900 | $350 |