Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST95, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and ST95 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR III was revealed 7 years after the ST95 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR III scores against the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST95. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung ST95
GR III | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2011 | Newer by 94 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh GR III
ST95 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST95
GR III | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III provides outer measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the GR III compared to the ST95.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and ST95.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $900 | $145 |