Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and WB1100F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR III was launched 4 years after the WB1100F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR III matches up vs the WB1100F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB1100F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung WB1100F
GR III | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2014 | Newer by 58 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GR III
WB1100F | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung WB1100F
GR III | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III offers external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III against the WB1100F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and WB1100F is 90 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and WB1100F.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR III featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher GR III will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lbs) | 512 gr (1.13 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $900 | $250 |