Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR III and Sigma DP2 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR III was released 6 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GR III matches up against the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR III and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| GR III | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 81 months |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh GR III
| DP2 Merrill | GR III |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| GR III | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the GR III vs the DP2 Merrill.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and DP2 Merrill.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh GR III to show greater detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh GR III vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Ricoh GR III | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2018-09-25 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 102400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 6cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640x480 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $900 | $931 |