Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
68 Imaging
76 Features
84 Overall
79
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 625g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Released June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony A7R
- Newer Model is Sony A7R III
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh GR III versus Sony A7R II, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and A7R II (42MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and A7R II (Full frame) provide different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR III was manufactured 3 years later than the A7R II and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A7R II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR III grades against the A7R II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III & Sony Alpha A7R II. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony A7R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony A7R II
GR III | A7R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | June 2015 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R II over the Ricoh GR III
A7R II | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Clearer display (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony A7R II
GR III | A7R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III has got external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony A7R II has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR III versus Sony A7R II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GR III against the A7R II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and A7R II is 90 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and A7R II.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR III because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A7R II will provide greater detail due to its extra 18MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR III should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Sony A7R II Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A7R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Sony Alpha A7R II |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 7974 x 5316 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 399 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 98 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3434 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $900 | $2,913 |