Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65


53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV

Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR III (24MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is relatively comparable but the GR III (APS-C) and RX10 III (1") posses different sensor sizes.

The GR III was manufactured 2 years after the RX10 III which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR III matches up against the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Sony RX10 III
GR III | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | March 2016 | More modern by 31 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Ricoh GR III
RX10 III | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Sony RX10 III
GR III | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III offers outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GR III compared to the RX10 III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The image underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and RX10 III.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will produce extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GR III provides an edge in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $900 | $1,398 |