Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GR and Ricoh WG-70, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Ricoh. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively close but the GR (APS-C) and WG-70 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR was launched 7 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GR matches up against the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh WG-70
| GR | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh GR
| WG-70 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | April 2013 | Fresher by 82 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Ricoh WG-70
| GR | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR provides physical measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR and Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR and the WG-70.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and WG-70 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and WG-70.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The GR has got the bigger sensor which will make achieving bokeh easier. The older GR will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh GR vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $971 | $280 |