Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched February 2013
- Additionally referred to as Wi-Fi
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR and Samsung Galaxy Camera, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera (16MP) is fairly close but the GR (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was announced 2 months after the Galaxy Camera which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the GR scores versus the Galaxy Camera in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Samsung Galaxy Camera. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
| GR | Galaxy Camera | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Ricoh GR
| Galaxy Camera | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung Galaxy Camera
| GR | Galaxy Camera | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2013 |  | February 2013 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR and Samsung Galaxy Camera in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the GR versus the Galaxy Camera.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and Galaxy Camera is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and Galaxy Camera.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The GR offers the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh GR vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
| Other name | - | Wi-Fi |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2013-02-19 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 300 grams (0.66 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $971 | $450 |