Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220

Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung TL220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Samsung TL220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Introduced August 2009
  • Alternate Name is ST500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung TL220, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and TL220 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and TL220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The GR was launched 3 years later than the TL220 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL220 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the GR grades versus the TL220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung TL220

 GR TL220 
IntroducedApril 2013August 2009More recent by 45 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL220 over the Ricoh GR

 TL220 GR 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL220

 GR TL220 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR comes with outside dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL220 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 169 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung TL220 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the GR against the TL220.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and TL220 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and TL220.

Clearly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger GR will have an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Portrait photography features
Samsung TL220 Portrait photography features
74
manual focus
above average flash sync (1/4,000s)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
21
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR
Street photography with Samsung TL220
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than others in class (245g)
good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography factors
Samsung TL220 Sports photography factors
45
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow frames per second (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Travel photography factors
Samsung TL220 Travel photography factors
71
lighter than others in class (245g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
62
features focus by touch
flash built-in
rather wide (27mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
Landscape photography with Samsung TL220
61
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3")
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
37
rather wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR
Vlogging with Samsung TL220
30
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone jack
31
rather wide (27mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung TL220
 Ricoh GRSamsung TL220
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung TL220
Also Known as - ST500
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-04-17 2009-08-13
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 300 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 3.40 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/4000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 grams (0.54 pounds) 169 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $971 $90