Clicky

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320

Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56
Ricoh GR front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Updated by Ricoh GR II
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB1000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR versus Samsung TL320, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the GR (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and TL320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR was introduced 4 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the GR scores vs the TL320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung TL320

 GR TL320 
LaunchedApril 2013February 2009More recent by 51 months
Screen resolution1230k460kClearer screen (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh GR

 TL320 GR 

Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL320

 GR TL320 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR enjoys outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

See the Ricoh GR versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR and the TL320.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and TL320.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent GR is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR
Portrait photography with Samsung TL320
74
manual focus
flash sync speed is above average (1/4,000 seconds)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
34
manual focus
features face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Street photography factors
Samsung TL320 Street photography factors
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (245 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Sports photography information
Samsung TL320 Sports photography information
45
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
max fps low (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
30
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR
Travel photography with Samsung TL320
71
lighter than competition (245 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
Landscape photography with Samsung TL320
62
manual focus
good sized screen (3")
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
43
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL320 as a Vlogging camera
30
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (245g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
31
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh GRSamsung TL320
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Samsung TL320
Also Known as - WB1000
Class Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2013-04-17 2009-02-23
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.40 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash options - Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/4000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 gr (0.54 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 78 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 972 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD, SDHC, SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $971 $380