Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is very comparable but the GR (APS-C) and WB1100F (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was brought out 8 months before the WB1100F and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR matches up against the WB1100F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung WB1100F
| GR | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GR
| WB1100F | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | April 2013 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung WB1100F
| GR | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR has got outer measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the GR and the WB1100F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and WB1100F is 90 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and WB1100F.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The GR includes the larger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged GR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Samsung WB1100F |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 512 gr (1.13 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $971 | $250 |
