Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Ricoh GR versus Sony NEX-C3, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR was manufactured 21 months after the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the GR grades against the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony NEX-C3
GR | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 21 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh GR
NEX-C3 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony NEX-C3
GR | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR provides external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR versus Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GR compared to the NEX-C3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and NEX-C3 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you have to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern GR provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 78 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 972 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 400 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $971 | $343 |