Ricoh GR vs Sony H300
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR versus Sony H300, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GR (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is relatively similar but the GR (APS-C) and H300 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was unveiled 10 months prior to the H300 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the GR matches up vs the H300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony H300
GR | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Ricoh GR
H300 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | April 2013 | More modern by 10 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony H300
GR | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR has got external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony H300 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR versus Sony H300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR against the H300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and H300 is 90 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The pic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and H300.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony H300 will offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged GR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony H300 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 8.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 590 gr (1.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $971 | $249 |