Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR versus Sony TX1, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the GR (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR was brought out 3 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GR matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony TX1
GR | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 45 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh GR
TX1 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony TX1
GR | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR offers outer dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR versus Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the GR compared to the TX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR and TX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and TX1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh GR will provide extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer GR is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-04-17 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 142g (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $971 | $350 |