Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly well matched but the GR (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR was released 15 months after the TX200V making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR scores versus the TX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony TX200V
GR | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 15 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GR
TX200V | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony TX200V
GR | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 1230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR features exterior measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR vs the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and TX200V.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony TX200V will give more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer GR provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-04-17 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $971 | $500 |