Ricoh GR vs Sony W350
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
97 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Ricoh GR vs Sony W350, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR (16MP) and the W350 (14MP) is relatively close but the GR (APS-C) and W350 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR was unveiled 3 years after the W350 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the GR scores against the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony W350
| GR | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Ricoh GR
| W350 | GR |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony W350
| GR | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR offers outside measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony W350 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the GR vs the W350.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR and W350 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR and W350.
All in all, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR will render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GR provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh GR vs Sony W350 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-04-17 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB65 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $971 | $200 |
