Ricoh GR vs Sony W370
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh GR and Sony W370, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the W370 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the GR (APS-C) and W370 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR was launched 3 years after the W370 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the GR scores versus the W370 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery & Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony W370
| GR | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Ricoh GR
| W370 | GR |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony W370
| GR | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR has got external dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR and Sony W370 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GR and the W370.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GR and W370 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR and W370.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger GR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-04-17 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.6-5.6 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 78 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $971 | $230 |