Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Updated by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2014
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR (16MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is fairly similar but the GR (APS-C) and WX220 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR was manufactured 10 months before the WX220 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the GR scores against the WX220 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Sony WX220
GR | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Ricoh GR
WX220 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | April 2013 | Newer by 10 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Sony WX220
GR | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR enjoys outside dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has dimensions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the GR versus the WX220.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR and WX220 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR and WX220.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony WX220 will offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged GR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-04-17 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 210 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $971 | $198 |