Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WG-4 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the WG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh WG-4
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WG-4 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | November 2009 | More modern by 51 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Ricoh WG-4
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the WG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WG-4 is 77 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WG-4.
All in all, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Ricoh WG-4 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 240 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $566 | $330 |