Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WG-4 GPS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | November 2009 | More recent by 51 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WG-4 GPS is 77 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 240 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $566 | $210 |