Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Launched January 2008
- Older Model is Samsung GX-10
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung GX-20, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 22 months later than the GX-20 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the GX-20 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung GX-20. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung GX-20
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | January 2008 | Fresher by 22 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GX-20 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung GX-20
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro enjoys physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung GX-20 has measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung GX-20 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the GX-20.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and GX-20 is 77 and 58 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and GX-20.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung GX-20 to resolve more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung GX-20 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2008-01-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4688 x 3120 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $566 | $850 |