Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung HZ10W, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is pretty close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and HZ10W (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 6 months after the HZ10W and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up vs the HZ10W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung HZ10W
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
HZ10W | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung HZ10W
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2009 | May 2009 | Same age | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features external dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the HZ10W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and HZ10W is 77 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The picture here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and HZ10W.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will render greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung HZ10W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 3648 x 2432 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $566 | $300 |