Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Introduced December 2010
- Replaced the Samsung NX10
- Successor is Samsung NX20
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung NX11, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 13 months prior to the NX11 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the NX11 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung NX11. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung NX11
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
NX11 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2010 | November 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung NX11
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung NX11 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung NX11 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the NX11.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NX11 is 77 and 80 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NX11.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung NX11 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung NX11 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 11.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lb) | 499g (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 400 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $566 | $626 |