Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the PL210 (14MP) is very well matched but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and PL210 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was released 14 months earlier than the PL210 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung PL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the PL210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung PL210. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung PL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung PL210
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
PL210 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | November 2009 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung PL210
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL210 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the PL210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and PL210 is 77 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and PL210.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung PL210 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung PL210 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung PL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung PL210 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | - |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $566 | $200 |