Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and ST65 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched 14 months earlier than the ST65 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro grades vs the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung ST65
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
ST65 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | November 2009 | More recent by 14 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung ST65
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got physical measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs the ST65.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ST65 is 77 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and ST65.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung ST65 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung ST65 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $566 | $130 |