Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB1100F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured 5 years before the WB1100F which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the WB1100F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB1100F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB1100F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | November 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB1100F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB1100F has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the WB1100F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB1100F is 77 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB1100F.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Samsung WB1100F will offer you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-11-10 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lb) | 512 grams (1.13 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $566 | $250 |