Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
The following is a extended review of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB2200F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WB2200F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB2200F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB2200F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | November 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB2200F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WB2200F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB2200F is 77 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB2200F.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will result in extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-11-10 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 1/8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453g (1.00 lb) | 708g (1.56 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $566 | $599 |