Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Announced November 2009
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

The following is a extended review of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB2200F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB2200F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WB2200F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB2200F

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB2200F 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 WB2200F GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014November 2009Newer by 50 months

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB2200F

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB2200F 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro comes with outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WB2200F.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB2200F is 77 and 59 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB2200F.

Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB2200F will result in extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind in sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography highlights
55
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
44
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
offers face detect focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Street photography with Samsung WB2200F
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (708g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Sports photography camera
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery power (320 per charge)
no phase detect AF
53
incredible zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Travel photography camera
49
built-in flash
not so great battery power (320 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
51
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (20mm)
long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (708g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Landscape photography camera
46
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3")
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (320 shots)
46
focusing manually
pretty wide (20mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Vlogging camera
20
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic jack
25
pretty wide (20mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (708g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB2200F
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung WB2200F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung WB2200F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-11-10 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 2848 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 1/8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453g (1.00 lb) 708g (1.56 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $566 $599