Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820

Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung SL820 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2012
Samsung SL820
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally Known as IT100
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL820 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 3 years later than the SL820 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the SL820 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL820

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SL820 
ReleasedFebruary 2012February 2009More recent by 36 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 SL820 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 SL820 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outer dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the SL820.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL820 is 69 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL820.

All in all, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL820 Portrait photography features
74
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
26
includes face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Street photography with Samsung SL820
55
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
heavier than others in class (550 grams)
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Sports photography with Samsung SL820
48
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography information
Samsung SL820 Travel photography information
59
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
heavier than others in class (550 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL820 Landscape photography advice
63
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung SL820 as a Vlogging camera
24
pretty wide (24mm)
comes with face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than others in class (550g)
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
includes face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung SL820
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung SL820
Also referred to as - IT100
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-02 2009-02-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-85mm (3.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/3.4-5.8
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 550 grams (1.21 pounds) 168 grams (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-90 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $871 $280