Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a5cc/0a5cc7b9983c113fe209f782afc9571c03761a19" alt="Samsung SL820 front Samsung SL820 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as IT100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and SL820 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and SL820 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 3 years later than the SL820 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the SL820 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung SL820. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung SL820
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 36 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
SL820 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outer dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung SL820 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the SL820.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6021d/6021d68dd1fec6a5007a37768baba997e81f791b" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL820 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25211/252115f2e3a162e0f9acc03833ab8470cbc127c8" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and SL820.
All in all, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f4e/78f4e24294520103c4c8541f5be52d6d2c516023" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68efe/68efefe779eafc9f8d3651e9701d9098c4f61233" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung SL820 |
Also referred to as | - | IT100 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $871 | $280 |