Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b34/d2b34be0402f7c9fe3c7c9ed4462bc8843f628b6" alt="Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung ST150F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and ST150F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was revealed 11 months before the ST150F which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores against the ST150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung ST150F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
ST150F | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung ST150F
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has external measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung ST150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 against the ST150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/777de/777deea0d9eb13ec2e29522a754289844101b4d7" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and ST150F is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebe57/ebe578a8edaa878b71f187b4ac5c9cd6a260246a" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and ST150F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69b38/69b38b0a58ce5a69f6206ffb0fdff8f404e1b262" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e08a/5e08a2294d5154c7706463e09bbd35ec458dee9f" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung ST150F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 lb) | 114g (0.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $871 | $300 |