Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9ca7/e9ca7270095befcdcbc7bcfd56c0a0f7bda90270" alt="Samsung TL100 front Samsung TL100 front"
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as ST50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL100, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL100 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was unveiled 3 years later than the TL100 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL100 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 grades vs the TL100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL100. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL100
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 38 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TL100 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL100
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has exterior dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus the TL100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/235b7/235b7aeeef908a6e95aac1c6b5e15de4b46ff788" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL100 is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e816/2e816455497a94ae5331ee1e9fa8792b921a2053" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL100.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61617/61617d937f95ae9d368d9bc4549a50481ad2bdee" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23f30/23f30e5cbdae73a650916f5c7a6d36d46dbb46fe" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL100 |
Also Known as | - | ST50 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-02-02 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 pounds) | 219g (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $871 | $22 |