Clicky

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350

Portability
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
 
Samsung TL350 front
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Launched February 2012
Samsung TL350
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Additionally referred to as WB2000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL350, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL350 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was introduced 24 months after the TL350 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores vs the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL350

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL350 
LaunchedFebruary 2012February 2010Newer by 24 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

		

		

			
 TL350 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL350

		

		

			
 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TL350 
Manual focus  More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution920k920kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither has Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the TL350.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL350 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL350.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
	
			Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Portrait photography with Samsung TL350
74
 manual focus
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 comes with face detect focusing
 exports RAW formats
35
 you can focus manually
 supports RAW formats
 external flash not possible
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography advice
Samsung TL350 Street photography advice
55
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 exports RAW formats
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than average in class (550 grams)
65
 image stabilization (Optical)
 supports RAW formats
 no moving screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography highlights
Samsung TL350 Sports photography highlights
48
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
 lack of image stabilization
 lacks phase detect AF
29
 image stabilization (Optical)
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Travel photography with Samsung TL350
59
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 heavier than average in class (550g)
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
60
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 resolution not great (10MP)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography details
Samsung TL350 Landscape photography details
63
 manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 resolution is good (16MP)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 exports RAW formats
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 lack of image stabilization
50
 you can focus manually
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 supports RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
 resolution not great (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Vlogging with Samsung TL350
24
 relatively wide (24mm)
 comes with face detect focusing
 sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 no mic jack
 heavier than average in class (550g)
32
 fairly wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 no microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL350
 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5Samsung TL350
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Samsung TL350
Otherwise known as - WB2000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-02 2010-02-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3 and  16:9
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-85mm (3.5x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.5 f/2.4-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 180s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance - 5.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 H.264
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 550g (1.21 pounds) 195g (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 400 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-90 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $871 $400