Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51


94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB2000

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL350, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL350 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was introduced 24 months after the TL350 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores vs the TL350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL350. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL350
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TL350 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL350
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the TL350.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL350 is 69 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL350.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will provide extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL350 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-02 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550g (1.21 pounds) | 195g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $871 | $400 |