Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WG-M1 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | September 2010 | More recent by 48 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Ricoh WG-M1
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 provides physical dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WG-M1.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-M1 will result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | (1×) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-90 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $566 | $2,000 |